Science is not just about performing experiments; it is also about analyzing and interpreting the data they produce.
These two terms are not synonymous in science.
It is possible for measurements to be precise but not accurate (e.g., a miscalibrated scale that gives the same wrong weight every time). The goal is to be both.
Graphs are a crucial tool for visualizing relationships in data.
This is one of the most important and misunderstood concepts in data interpretation.
The Key Idea: Correlation does not imply causation. Just because two variables are correlated does not mean that one causes the other. There could be a third, unobserved 'confounding' variable that is causing both.
In an experiment testing the effect of fertilizer amount on plant height, which variable should be plotted on the x-axis of a graph?
A student measures the boiling point of water five times and gets the following results: 96.5°C, 96.4°C, 96.6°C, 96.5°C, 96.5°C. The true boiling point at their altitude is 100.0°C. Are these measurements accurate, precise, both, or neither?
What is the crucial difference between correlation and causation?