Scientific inquiry relies on two primary forms of logical reasoning: deduction and induction.
Deductive reasoning starts with a general statement or hypothesis (a premise) and examines the possibilities to reach a specific, logical conclusion.
Example:
If the first two statements are true, the conclusion is inescapable.
Inductive reasoning makes broad generalizations from specific observations.
Example:
This conclusion seems reasonable but is not guaranteed. The discovery of a single black swan (which exist) would falsify this inductive conclusion.
| Feature | Deductive Reasoning | Inductive Reasoning |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
| Direction | General → Specific | Specific → General |
| Starting Point| Theory, Hypothesis, General Statement | Observation, Data, Specific Evidence |
| Conclusion | Certainty (if premises are true) | Probability (a likely generalization) |
| Key Use | Testing theories, mathematical proofs | Forming theories, making generalizations |
A scientist states the following: 'Every metal I have tested conducts electricity. Therefore, all metals must conduct electricity.' Is this an example of inductive or deductive reasoning?
Provide a complete example of deductive reasoning, including two premises and a conclusion.
Which type of reasoning leads to conclusions that are certain, and which leads to conclusions that are probable?