An exoplanet is any planet orbiting a star outside of our solar system. For centuries, we could only speculate about their existence. Now, thanks to powerful telescopes and clever techniques, we have confirmed the existence of thousands of exoplanets.
Detecting exoplanets is incredibly difficult. This is because planets are extremely small and faint compared to the enormous, bright stars they orbit. Directly imaging an exoplanet is like trying to spot a firefly next to a searchlight from miles away. For this reason, most exoplanets are found using indirect detection methods, where we observe the effect the planet has on its parent star.
This has been the most successful method for discovering exoplanets, famously used by NASA's Kepler Space Telescope.
This was the first method to successfully discover an exoplanet orbiting a sun-like star.
By combining both methods for the same system, astronomers can determine a planet's radius (from transit) and its mass (from radial velocity), which allows them to calculate its density and make inferences about its composition (e.g., rocky or gaseous).
Why are most exoplanets discovered using indirect methods instead of by taking direct pictures of them?
What is a stellar 'transit,' and what property of a star does it affect?
If astronomers use the radial velocity method and observe that a star's light is periodically blueshifting and redshifting, what can they infer?